채용 공고를 분석해 모호한 문구의 숨은 뜻, 필수 자격 요건, 채용 담당자용 질문을 정리합니다.
You read a job post for a job seeker. Work only from the post. Quote it for every claim. Do not say anything about the employer's culture, pay level or reputation. Never invent experience for me.
Job post:
[paste]
About me (optional, for fit): [current role, skills, what I want next]
Do this:
1. Say in three sentences what the person will do, who they will work with, and what success looks like, using only what the post says. Where it is vague, write "the post does not say".
2. Quote each requirement and sort it: Firm ("required", "must", "minimum"), Wish ("nice to have", "bonus", "preferred", "ideally"), or Unclear. Count the years of experience and the number of distinct tools or skills asked for. If the list looks unusually broad for one role, say it is your reading.
3. List what the post leaves out: pay, location or remote policy, hours, team size and reporting line, contract type, right-to-work wording, how to apply and next steps.
4. Quote phrases worth a question ("fast-paced", "wear many hats", "self-starter", "rockstar", "competitive salary" with no figure, "unlimited" benefits, "family" culture, on-call or travel). For each, say what it can mean and what to ask. These are prompts for questions, not proof.
5. Give six to eight specific questions to ask the recruiter.
6. If I gave my background: which firm requirements I seem to meet, which I do not, and three points to lead with.
End with one line: "Worth applying if..." based only on the post and what I told you. Do not call anything a scam. Plain short sentences, no em dashes.구직자를 위해 채용 공고를 분석하세요. 오직 공고 내용에 기반하여 답변하고, 모든 주장에는 공고 내용을 인용하세요. 회사의 문화, 연봉 수준, 평판에 대해 지어내지 마세요. 나의 경력을 허위로 만들어내지 마세요.
채용 공고:
[채용 공고 붙여넣기]
내 소개 (선택 사항, 적합도 확인용): [현재 직무, 보유 기술, 희망하는 다음 커리어]
다음 작업을 수행하세요:
1. 공고에 명시된 내용만 사용하여 이 역할이 할 일, 함께 일할 사람, 성공의 기준을 3문장으로 요약하세요. 모호한 부분은 "공고에 나와 있지 않음"이라고 적으세요.
2. 각 요구사항을 인용하고 구분하세요: 필수("필수", "무조건", "최소"), 우대("우대", "보너스", "선호"), 또는 불분명. 필요한 경력 연수와 요구되는 개별 툴/기술의 수 체크하세요. 한 역할치고 과도하게 넓다면 본인의 해석임을 밝히고 지적하세요.
3. 공고에서 누락된 항목을 나열하세요: 급여, 근무지/재택 정책, 근무 시간, 팀 규모 및 보고 체계, 계약 형태, 비자/취업 자격 조건, 지원 방법 및 다음 단계.
4. 질문해볼 만한 문구들을 인용하세요("빠른 성장의", "다양한 업무 수행", "주도적인", "경쟁력 있는 급여"(액수 없음), "무제한" 복지, "가족 같은" 문화, 온콜/출장 등). 각 문구가 의미할 수 있는 바와 질문할 내용을 정리하세요.
5. 채용 담당자에게 물어볼 구체적인 질문 6~8개를 제시하세요.
6. 내 배경지식을 제공한 경우: 내가 충족하는 필수 요건, 미달하는 요건, 면접 시 강조할 3가지 포인트를 정리하세요.
마지막은 공고와 입력 정보에 기반하여 "지원할 가치가 있는 이유: ..."라는 한 줄로 끝내세요. 자극적인 표현이나 긴 대시 문장 없이 담백하고 짧은 문장으로 작성하세요.출처 · prompts.chat · Job Post Decoder — 원문은 출처에 게시된 그대로이며, 권리는 원작자에게 있습니다.
Gemini로 실행한 결과입니다. 입력 항목에는 국내 환경의 예시값을 적용했습니다(AI 생성 — 사실 확인 필요).
You read a job post for a job seeker. Work only from the post. Quote it for every claim. Do not say anything about the employer's culture, pay level or reputation. Never invent experience for me.
Job post:
We are looking for a Senior Frontend Developer. You will build user-facing web applications using React and TypeScript. You will collaborate with product managers and backend engineers. Requirements: Must have 5+ years of experience in Frontend development. Must be proficient in React, TypeScript, Next.js, and Redux. Preferred: Experience with GraphQL and Docker. We offer a fast-paced environment where you wear many hats.
About me (optional, for fit): Current role: Mid-level Frontend Developer with 3 years of experience. Skills: React, TypeScript, CSS. What I want next: Senior developer role working on large-scale web applications.
Do this:
1. Say in three sentences what the person will do, who they will work with, and what success looks like, using only what the post says. Where it is vague, write "the post does not say".
2. Quote each requirement and sort it: Firm ("required", "must", "minimum"), Wish ("nice to have", "bonus", "preferred", "ideally"), or Unclear. Count the years of experience and the number of distinct tools or skills asked for. If the list looks unusually broad for one role, say it is your reading.
3. List what the post leaves out: pay, location or remote policy, hours, team size and reporting line, contract type, right-to-work wording, how to apply and next steps.
4. Quote phrases worth a question ("fast-paced", "wear many hats", "self-starter", "rockstar", "competitive salary" with no figure, "unlimited" benefits, "family" culture, on-call or travel). For each, say what it can mean and what to ask. These are prompts for questions, not proof.
5. Give six to eight specific questions to ask the recruiter.
6. If I gave my background: which firm requirements I seem to meet, which I do not, and three points to lead with.
End with one line: "Worth applying if..." based only on the post and what I told you. Do not call anything a scam. Plain short sentences, no em dashes.요구 경력은 최소 5년입니다. 요구 기술은 총 6개(React, TypeScript, Next.js, Redux, GraphQL, Docker)입니다. 한 직무치고는 백엔드 관련 도구까지 포함되어 다소 범위가 넓습니다.
Worth applying if you are willing to negotiate the experience gap and want to check working conditions during the hiring process.
원문과 같은 언어로 보완한 프롬프트입니다. 점수는 명확성 · 구체성 · 출력 형식 · 재사용성 기준의 AI 평가입니다.
Act as an expert career strategist. Analyze the provided job post strictly based on its explicit text. Do not make assumptions about employer culture, pay, or reputation, and never invent experience for the user.
Job post:
[Paste job post here]
About me (optional):
[Current role, skills, target goals]
Perform the following analysis step-by-step using clear markdown headers:
1. Summary: In exactly three sentences, state what the person will do, who they will work with, and what success looks like based only on the text. Write "The post does not say" wherever details are missing.
2. Requirements Analysis: Quote every requirement and categorize it as Firm ("required", "must", "minimum"), Wish ("preferred", "nice to have", "bonus"), or Unclear. State the total years of experience required and count distinct tools/skills mentioned. Note if the scope appears unusually broad.
3. Missing Details: List missing information regarding pay, location/remote policy, working hours, team size/reporting line, contract type, right-to-work requirements, and application steps.
4. Phrase Decoder: Quote ambiguous phrases (e.g., "fast-paced", "wear many hats", "competitive salary"). Explain potential interpretations and suggest what to ask.
5. Recruiter Questions: List 6 to 8 specific questions to ask the recruiter.
6. Fit Assessment (Only if "About me" is provided): Map candidate background against firm requirements (met vs. unmet) and provide 3 key points to lead with.
Final Constraints:
- End with exactly one line: "Worth applying if: [Condition based strictly on post and provided background]".
- Do not label any post as a scam.
- Use plain, short sentences. Do not use em dashes.